Archive for the ‘SREC Markets’ Category

Massachusetts 2015 SREC-I obligation announced

Posted July 8th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

Today, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) announced preliminary numbers for the 2015 SREC-I obligation. Assuming no changes, the 2015 SREC-I obligation will be 909,837 SRECs. The announcement can be found here.

 

In Massachusetts, the SREC compliance obligation, the amount of SRECs power suppliers are required to purchase in any given year, is determined by a formula that takes in to account the amount of SRECs to be generated, SRECs banked from previous periods, and the number of SRECs deposited and purchased in the Solar Credit Clearinghouse Auction (SCCA). For the 2013 compliance period, 138,685 SRECs were deposited in the SCCA. If the SCCA does not clear in the first or second round, the preliminary 2015 compliance requirement will increase by a multiple 2 times the number of deposited SRECs. The first round of the 2013 SCCA will begin on Tuesday, July 29, 2014. For more information on the SCCA and the auction schedule click here.

For more details on how the 2015 compliance obligation was calculated click here: Preliminary Determination of CY 2015 Total Compliance Obligation and Minimum Standard

The table below demonstrates the 2015 compliance obligation if the SCCA clears in the first or second round or if the auction goes to the third round:

2015 Compliance Obligation

UPDATE: The DOER revised the 2015 SREC-I Minimum Standard percentage numbers on July 10, 2014. The DOER did not adjust the SREC compliance numbers. Original email can be found here. Please see the revised percentages below.

2015 Revised Compliance Percentage

Mass. DOER Seeks Stakeholder Input on Residential Solar Loan Program Design

Posted June 27th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

The Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) recently announced a plan to solicit stakeholder input regarding the implementation of a Residential Solar Loan Program.  The goal of this program is to provide homeowners with access to solar loans while providing new business opportunities for local lenders. This new program is anticipated to launch in the fall of 2014.

Feedback will be solicited during three public stakeholder meetings hosted by the DOER.  The time and locations of these meetings are as follows:

Eastern Massachusetts
Monday June 30th,  10am – 12pm, Conference Room C & D, Second Floor, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA

Western
 Massachusetts
Tuesday July 1st, 1pm – 3pm, Dining Commons, 1 College Drive, Greenfield Community College, Greenfield, MA

Central Massachusetts
Wednesday July 2nd, 10am – 12pm, Weiss Room, Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, 75 North Drive Westborough, MA

To RSVP for a meeting please email: (emma.krause@state.ma.us )

A copy of the official announcement letter can be found here.

Massachusetts Telecom Utilities and Energy (TUE) Committee reports adverse SREC legislation to Ways and Means Committee

Posted June 17th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

On Friday, June 13, 2013, the Massachusetts Telecom, Utilities and Energy (TUE) Committee voted to report H. 3901 / S. 2019 to the Joint Ways and Means Committee. The legislation could be put up for consideration by the Ways and Means Committee as early as Wednesday, June 18th. If adopted in to law, without amendments, the controversial bill would remove the existing net metering capacity limits  in exchange for the implementation of a utility administered declining block incentive program (in lieu of the current SREC program) and institute  a minimum surcharge for all ratepayers.  Facilities interconnected in areas operated by Municipal Light Districts would not have access to the new declining block program.

What does net metering have to do with SRECs?

SRECs and net metering are the key components of the performance based value that solar investors realize for installing solar facilities, but the relationship stops there. Net metering (credit for electricity delivered to the electric grid) is accounted for as a bill offset  that utility customers are credited for on their electric bill. SRECs are purchased by the competitive power suppliers that sell electricity to the electric distribution companies (note: regulated utilities may also purchase SRECs to cover the standard offer service load delivered by competitive power suppliers).

The fast moving H. 3901 / S. 2019 bills were first publicly announced June 11th, during a meeting facilitated by the Department of Energy Resources (DOER) in Boston. Born initially from a need to negotiate a means to raise the net metering caps in Massachusetts, H. 3901 / S. 2019 would remove the net metering caps in exchange for allowing a change in MA’s solar incentive, a reduction in net metering and virtual net metering values, and a minimum bill charge.

Filed Bill and 6/11/2014 Stakeholder Presentation

Filed bill – H.3901 / S.2019
Summary – H.3901 / S.2019
Meeting Presentation – June 11, 2014 Stakeholder Meeting

 

An advocacy group named the Massachusetts Stakeholders for Competitive Solar has been formed. The group advocates that while a resolution must be reached to raise the net metering caps, it is unreasonable to prematurely replace a successful incentive program that is a proven success (for another unproven incentive) without appropriate input from the greater Massachusetts solar stakeholder community. Here is a copy of the letter covering this position. If you share the views in this group, you can sign on and show your support for the position here.

Ohio SB 310 Signed into Law by Governor Kasich

Posted June 16th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

Friday, 6/13/2014,  Ohio Governor John Kasich signed Ohio SB 310, bringing about major changes for Ohio’s renewable energy economy. Most importantly, the bill will place a two year freeze on Ohio’s Renewable Portfolio Standard requirements and end Ohio’s in-state purchasing requirements for SRECs. Pro-business and pro-utilities interests insist that the original legislation set unrealistic goals and placed unnecessary economic strain on Ohio ratepayers, despite evidence that the costs were less than $5 annually per household.

Here are the details of how this bill will affect SREC producers in and around Ohio:

  • Ohio RPS requirement frozen at 2014 levels through 2016. The original RPS schedule will resume with a two year delay after the freeze. The adjusted schedules are detailed in the following table:

SB 310 Screenshot

  • Ohio’s Solar Alternative Compliance Payment (SACP) will be similarly frozen at 2014 levels through 2016. The SACP is currently set at $300, and after 2016 will begin to decline by $50 every two years to reach a minimum of $50 by 2026.
  • The 50% in-state purchasing requirement for SRECs has been eliminated. All of Ohio’s SRECs may now be purchased from adjacent states.

Because the freeze on the RPS and SACP requirements is set to this year’s levels, impacts of these changes will not be felt until the beginning of 2015. The end of the in-state purchasing requirement, however, is effective immediately.

Though presented as a bill to buy time for Ohio’s legislature to discuss a responsible path forward for their state’s renewable energy economy, SB 310 is a significant step in the wrong direction for Ohio’s renewable energy future.

MA DOER Solar Stakeholder Meeting Recap

Posted June 11th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

Today, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (MA DOER) and representatives from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), New England Clean Energy Council (NECEC), and the Massachusetts regulated utilities presented their legislative proposal to address lifting solar net metering caps.

What This Legislation Covers

While the issue at hand is solar net metering, the bill also addresses several other areas, including the following:

  • Shifting the state’s successful, competitive Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC) incentive program to a declining block incentive program centrally administered by the MA regulated utilities (note SREC-I and SREC-II would be left in place as is. New capacity under SREC-II could be qualified through 2015);
  • Restructuring the rules associated with behind the meter, virtual meter, and non-net metered “merchant” projects; and
  • Implementing a minimum bill, regardless of electricity used, for all regulated utility customers.

Unknown Aspects To Be Determined

Under the current version of the legislation, pricing for the declining block incentive program has not yet been set. It is proposed that the, “declining block values will be established through a DOER stakeholder process and DPU adjudication and will consider differential economic needs of various market sectors”. Additionally, “the amount of the minimum bill will be set in a DPU proceeding”.

Moving Forward

At this point, the bill is subject to a legislative process. The state’s Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy (TUE) is expected to move to refer a version of the legislation out of committee by Friday, June 13th. From there it is believed to be reviewed by the Joint Committee on Ways and Means. If this legislation were to move forward, it would then need to be moved to the floor of the senate or the house, passed, referred to the other side of the legislature and passed, and then signed into law by the Governor.

For access to the latest draft of the legislation click here. For a summary of the points as prepared by the MA DOER click here.

If you would like to influence the legislative process, we suggest you reach out to the TUE or Ways and Means committees and express your thoughts. Additionally, for a directory of MA legislators click here.

This process remains fluid with more information and updates forthcoming. We’ll continue to provide updates on our blog as they are available.

DOER Solar Stakeholder Meeting June 11th from 2-4pm at Federal Reserve Bank Boston

Posted June 10th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

Last Friday, the DOER released a joint-proposal made by regulated utilities in Massachusetts and a small group of solar industry stakeholders to lift the Massachusetts net metering caps in exchange for the end of the Massachusetts SREC program in 2015. The DOER will host an open stakeholder meeting to discuss the legislative proposal on Wednesday, June 11th from 2:00 – 4:00 pm ET at the Federal Reserve Bank in Boston (600 Atlantic Ave).

To attend Wednesday’s meeting you must RSVP by emailing doer.srec@state.ma.us with the subject “June 11th RSVP”. Government issued ID must be presented at entry.

Below are PDF links to both the draft legislation and the DOER’s own highlights of the legislation’s salient points.

Steven Eisenberg (CEO) and Alex Sheets (Director of Environmental Markets) will represent SRECTrade at the meeting.

June 2014 SREC Pricing Update and Auction Results

Posted June 4th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

As of June 3, 2014, below is a summary of indicative pricing across the SREC markets SRECTrade covers (for a PDF copy click here). For June 2014 auction results, scroll down.

2014_06_03_SRECTrade_SREC_Markets__for blog

Note: All pricing and notes included are indicative and subject to change. Please contact us for most current markets. If a market is not quoted herein, please contact us directly for further information. 

Additionally, SRECTrade’s June 2014 SREC Auction closed on 6/03/2014. The clearing prices presented below are representative of transactions executed through the SRECTrade auction. This does not include over the counter spot and forward contract transactions completed through SRECTrade’s brokerage desk. For more information on our brokerage services for corporate clients please click here.

Below are the clearing prices by vintage across the SRECs transacted in the auction.

Auction Prices SREC Vintage Year
State 2011 2012 2013 2014
Delaware $65.00 $65.00 $65.00 N/A
Maryland N/A $135.00 $135.00 $135.00
Massachusetts N/A N/A $270.01 N/A
New Jersey N/A $177.00 $177.00 $181.17
Ohio Sited N/A N/A N/A N/A
Ohio Adjacent N/A N/A N/A $45.00
Pennsylvania N/A $45.00 $45.00 $45.00
Washington, DC N/A $475.00 N/A $482.00

The next SRECTrade auction for the PJM and MA SREC markets will close on Tuesday, July 15th, at 5 p.m. ET.

This document is the copyright of SRECTrade, Inc. No portion of this document may be photocopied, reproduced, scanned into and electronic system or transmitted, forwarded or distributed in any way without prior consent of SRECTrade, Inc.

OH State Legislature Passes Anti-Renewable Energy Bill with 53-38 Vote

Posted May 29th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

May 28, 2014 – The Ohio State House passed SB 310 in a historic 53-38 vote today. SB 310, touted as a pro-consumer, pro-business bill, weakens Ohio’s existing Alternative Energy Portfolio, calling it too expensive for Ohio ratepayers. This despite analysis that shows the actual cost to Ohio ratepayers is likely less than $5 per household per year. Instead, SB 310, freezes the current standards in place through 2016 and allows all of Ohio’s renewable energy requirement to be met by facilities located in Ohio and bordering states. Should Ohio Governor Kasich sign SB 310, (the bill passed the Ohio Senate on May 8, 2014), Ohio ratepayers will subsidize renewable energy in other states, without any state-level guarantee for renewable energy in Ohio itself.

Click here for Twitter-based public reaction.

Regardless of your sentiments about renewable energy, SB 310 is overtly anti-ratepayer and bad for renewable energy jobs in Ohio. This is a step back for Ohio’s renewable energy economy and sends a clear signal to the business community that Ohio’s commitments are not to be trusted.

SB 310 will be immediately sent to Governor Kasich’s desk to sign a day after his office launched a new OhioMeansJobs website. Kasich’s decision to veto or sign SB 310 will test the meaning of his commitment to Ohio’s economic future.

If you are an Ohio resident, please contact Governor Kasich’s office and let him know your opinion.

Governor Kasich

Phone Number: (614) 466-3555

Complete List of Kasich Office Staffers’ Names and Contact Information

 

 

Ohio House Public Utilities Committee Passes SB 310: Full House Vote Imminent

Posted May 27th, 2014 by SRECTrade.

Today, May 27, 2014, the Ohio State House Public Utilities Committee passed the House version of SB 310 by a vote of 13-9. It is likely that the Ohio House will vote on the bill sometime this week.  If passed by the House and signed by  Ohio Governor Kasich, SB 310 would freeze Ohio’s renewable energy targets through 2016 and allow all of the state’s renewable energy targets to be met by facilities located in Ohio and bordering states.  The bill already passed the Ohio Senate on May 8, 2014.

SB 310 faces clear opposition from members of Ohio’s business and renewable energy stakeholder groups. Notably the Ohio Manaufacturers’ Association (OMA) testified before the House Public Utilities Committee on May 14th saying that SB 310 is bad for business. SB 310 is a step back for renewable energy advocates in Ohio and as written does not serve the general interests of Ohio ratepayers. In effect, the bill would have Ohio ratepayers subsidize renewable energy in other states while undermining the renewable energy economy within Ohio.

If you are an Ohio resident with an interest in continuing to grow Ohio’s clean energy industry, please use this list to express your point of view by contacting your State House Representative.

http://www.ohiohouse.gov/members/member-directory

SRECTrade will continue to posts updates as appropriate.

 

Ohio Legislature poised to pass legislation freezing Renewable Portfolio Standard

Posted May 21st, 2014 by SRECTrade.

As mentioned in our May 9th blog post, the Ohio State Senate passed SB 310. If signed in to law, the bill that would reduce the Ohio mandate for renewable energy installations, and allow the mandate for renewable energy in Ohio to be completely met with out-of-state facilities. The house version of the bill is up for consideration this week and is supported by Ohio Governor John Kasich who is quoted as saying that Ohio’s RPS mandates are, “simply unrealistic and will drive up energy costs for job creators and consumers.”

Overall, however, the financial impact of the Ohio RPS on ratepayers is likely quite low and represents approximately 0.45% of the total cost of electricity that Ohioans pay, or about $5 per average ratepayer per year. A more in depth analysis by SRECTrade of the RPS cost to OH ratepayers can be found here.