Archive for the ‘SREC Markets’ Category

Arizona – Utility Solar Incentives

Posted July 1st, 2010 by SRECTrade.

Note: Refer to our Arizona SREC page for specifics about any SREC potential.

There is currently no viable SREC market in Arizona as the state Renewable Energy Standard does not have a solar carve-out. The Renewable Energy Standard in Arizona requires the utilities to acquire renewable energy bundled with RECs.

While trading AZ SRECs in an an online auction is currently not a viable option, some Arizona utilities offer upfront and performance based incentive programs to encourage the installation of solar. Below is an overview of the incentives currently in place.

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP):

  • Owners accepting the upfront incentive sign a 20 year REC agreement with the utility.
  • The residential (systems up to 20 kW) incentive through TEP for 2010 is $3.00/watt for grid tied systems and $2.00/watt for off-grid systems.
  • The small commercial (systems up to 100 kW) incentive through TEP  for 2010 is $2.50/watt for grid tied systems
  • The large commercial (systems greater than 100 kW) incentive through TEP for 2010 differs from the upfront incentive payments for the residential and small commercial programs. Large commercial solar installations are provided with a performance based incentive (PBI), which means that customers will receive a fixed price for their SRECs over a set period of time. This PBI is offered to commercial grid tied systems as follows:
    • 10-Year REC and Payment Agreement for 18.2 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $182)
    • 15-Year REC and Payment Agreement for 16.7 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $167)
    • 20-Year REC and Payment Agreement for 16.2 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $162)
  • The total upfront incentive can’t be greater than 60% of the total system cost. The incentive amounts for 2011-2014 are scheduled at the 2010 rates, but are still to be approved. Also, TEP incentives in combination with all federal and state tax credits can be no more than 85% of total the project cost. A customer must cover at least 15% of the total project cost.

Salt River Project Water and Power (SRP) – Earthwise Solar Energy Program:

  • Home owners accepting the upfront incentive sign a 25 year REC agreement with the utility. Small commercial systems sign a 20 year REC agreement.
  • The residential incentive through SRP is $2.15/watt up to $10,750. This incentive level is set through April 30, 2011. Once a total capacity of 4.5 MW (4,500 kW) has been reserved, any additional applications received will be reserved at future incentive levels.
  • The small commercial incentive through SRP is $2.00/watt up to $60,000. This incentive level is set through April 30, 2011. The small commercial incentive currently has funds reserved for 0.5 MW (500 kW). As of 6/10/10,  46 kW has been reserved with another 120 kW pending approval.
  • The large commercial (systems greater than 30 kW) incentive through SRP for 2010 differs from the upfront incentive payments as outlined for the residential and small commercial programs. Large commercial solar installations are provided with a performance based incentive (PBI), which means that customers will receive a fixed price for their SRECs over a set period of time. The large commercial incentive currently has funds reserved for 5.0 MW (5,000 kW). As of 6/10/10,  864 kW has been reserved. This PBI is offered to commercial grid tied systems as follows:
    • 10-Year REC and Payment Agreement for 18.8 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $188)
    • 20-Year REC and Payment Agreement for 14.7 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $147)
    • SRP will receive the solar renewable energy credits for 20 years for both the 10 year and 20 year PBI plans.

APS:

  • System owners entering into an upfront incentive program sign a 20 year REC agreement with the utility.
  • The residential incentive through APS is $1.95/watt; as of June 17, 2010.
  • Non-residential systems can choose between upfront incentives and performance based incentives. Below is an overview of APS’ current offering:
    • Grid Tied:
      • Upfront incentive – up to $2.50/watt, capped at $75,000
      • Production based incentives –
        • 10 Year REC agreement / 10 Year Payment: 18.2 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $182)
        • 15 Year REC agreement / 15 Year Payment: 16.8 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $168)
        • 20 Year REC agreement / 10 Year Payment: 22.5 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $225)
        • 20 Year REC agreement / 20 Year Payment: 16.2 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $162)
    • Off Grid:
      • Upfront incentive – up to $1.50/watt, capped at $75,000
      • Production based incentives –
        • 10 Year REC agreement / 10 Year Payment: 12.1 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $121)
        • 15 Year REC agreement / 15 Year Payment: 11.2 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $112)
        • 20 Year REC agreement / 10 Year Payment: 15.0 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $150)
        • 20 Year REC agreement / 20 Year Payment: 10.8 cents / kWh (1 SREC for $108)
  • For systems under 100 kW, funding is divided into 6 bi-monthly allocation periods. Funding for systems over 100 kW is awarded on a competitive basis two times a year.

SRECTrade Analysis – Upfront Incentive Payment vs. Selling SRECs On the Spot Market:

  • Currently, although there is no market Arizona SRECs can be sold into, SRECTrade has conducted an analysis to determine an approximate SREC value at which solar system owners in Arizona may consider forgoing their utilities’ upfront incentive payment to realize greater value selling in an auction platform.
  • The analysis is made up of the following assumptions:
    1. A market with a great enough demand exists in which AZ solar system owners can sell their SRECs into
    2. The system size is assumed to have a capacity of 5 kW
    3. The low end upfront incentive payment is $1.95/watt (APS) and the high end is $3.00/watt (TEP)
    4. Arizona systems receive approximately 5.5 sun hours per day (assumption from wholesalesolar.com)
    5. The system generates approximately 10 SRECs per year
    6. Both the upfront incentive and the SRECs are considered taxable income; assumed tax rate 35%
    7. 20 year fixed SREC agreement with utility
    8. 10% discount rate to determine net present value of future cash flow from SREC sales
  • After taking these assumptions into consideration, the following valuations would have to be achievable for system owners to consider foregoing the upfront incentive option. Systems that receive an upfront incentive of $1.95/watt would have to sell SRECs into a market that could support a valuation of approximately $115/SREC . Systems that receive an upfront incentive of $3.00/watt would have to sell SRECs into a market that could support a valuation of approximately $175/SREC. Both scenarios result in a simple payback on the upfront incentive of approximately 8.5 years.

SRECTrade is watching the SREC market place to see how our platform can generate more value for Arizona SRECs. We will continue to provide additional information as the landscape changes.

California TREC Market Held Up

Posted June 29th, 2010 by SRECTrade.

On May 6, 2010, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) released its decision to stay the prior decision authorizing the use of tradable renewable energy certificates (TRECs) for compliance with the state’s renewable portfolio standard (RPS) program. This decision came after the April 23, 2010 workshop presentations, in which California’s IOUs discussed the valuation components and calculation of REC pricing.

The decision will be stayed pending resolutions of two petitions 1) the joint petition filed by Southern California Edison Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (the utility petition) and 2) the petition filed by the Independent Energy Producers Association (IEP).

As outlined in the CPUC’s decision, the petitions filed look to address the following points:

The utility petition seeks to:

  • Revise the criteria for what transactions are bundled and what can be unbundled for TREC trading
  • Apply the criteria only to contracts submitted for approval after the effective date of the decision
  • Eliminate the temporary limit on TRECs for compliance with the RPS by the large utilities
  • Expand the rules for “earmarking” TREC contracts to address current short-fall with future generation

The IEP petition seeks to:

  • Revise the criteria for bundled and unbundled transactions with revisions different from the utility’s petition
  • Expand the review of the least-cost best-fit methodology for RPS bid evaluation and set a time for its completion

In addition to the subjects the petitions seek to address, the decision also included the concurrences and dissents of the CPUCs commissioners. The full document can be viewed here.

SRECTrade will continue to watch the CPUC’s decision making process and provide updates as they become available.  We will maintain everything we know about it on our California SREC page.


Mountain View Solar & Wind to have Installation Aired on BBC

Posted June 22nd, 2010 by SRECTrade.

BBC world news is scheduled to feature the installation of solar panels on a home in Morgan County on BBC World News America’s 7 p.m. broadcast tonight. The piece was filmed on Thursday at the home of Dr. Donald and Selma Straus. The panels for the installation were provided by Mountain View Solar & Wind LLC, the largest solar and wind energy system installer in West Virginia. MVSW installs for both private homes, and for businesses, and hopes to use the publicity from the showing to get the word out about home and community-based renewable energy.

We are excited to see our partners at Mountain View Solar & Wind receive this recognition for their strong efforts in developing the solar industry in West Virginia. MVWS has been a pioneering force for solar in the state, helping their customers sell into the Washington DC and Pennsylvania platforms.

For more information on this story, see here, and be sure to tune in tonight to BBC World News America at 7:00 to see!


New Mexico SREC Information

Posted June 17th, 2010 by SRECTrade.

Note: Visit our New Mexico SREC page for specifics about any SREC potential.

New Mexico’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requirements have a solar renewable energy target, but the current structure does not allow for a vibrant SREC market. The RPS requires that Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) derive at least 20% of the state’s renewable energy from solar generation. While this is a step in the right direction, New Mexico has not put in place a Solar Alternative Compliance Payment (SACP) to drive a market price for SRECs. IOUs are required to purchase RECs to meet the RPS requirements, but if the requirements are not met within the year, the utilities have to make them up in the following year. Penalties can be implemented, but are in the form of retiring additional RECs within a designated generation category.

Although the current structure does not allow for monthly auctions, similar to what SRECTrade has created in other markets, New Mexico’s IOUs offer SREC purchase incentive programs. Below is an overview of their offerings.

PNM

Small PV Program: PNM will pay 13 cents/kWh ($130/SREC) for systems up to 10 kW. The system owner must enter into a 12 year agreement, but the agreement can be terminated upon 30 days written notice.

Large PV Program: PNM will pay 15 cents/kwh ($150/SREC) for systems greater than 10kW up to 1 MW. The system owner must enter into a 20 year agreement, but the agreement can be terminated upon 30 days written notice.

In addition to the SREC buy-back program, PNM offers a Net Metering program. This means that when your PV system produces more electricity in a given billing period than your facility uses, PNM will credit your account for the excess.

SPS (Xcel)

Solar*Rewards Small Program: SPS will pay 20 cents/kWh ($200/SREC) for systems between 0.5kW and 10kW. The system owner must enter into this agreement for a set term of 14 years.

Solar*Rewards Medium Program: SPS will pay 20 cents/kWh ($200/SREC) for systems between 10.1kW and 100kW. The system owner must enter into this agreement for a set term of 10 years.

Solar*Rewards Large Program: For systems greater than 100kW, SPS requests a proposal for REC buy-back. The contract term is negotiable for systems of this size.

In addition to the SREC buy-back program, SPS offers a Net Metering program. This means that when your PV system produces more electricity in a given billing period than your facility uses, SPS will credit your account for the excess.

El Paso Electric (EPE)

Small System Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Purchase: systems 10kW and less are eligible to receive 12 cents/kWh ($120/SREC). System owners must enter into this agreement for a 12 year term.

Medium System Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Purchase: systems between 10kW and 100kW are eligible to receive 15.5 cents/kWh ($155/SREC). System owners must enter into this agreement for a 12 year term.

Additionally, EPE offers a Net Metering program that will credit customer accounts for the excess energy produced by their solar panel systems.

SRECTrade will continue to watch the New Mexico market and keep participants up to date on the best methods for maximizing the value of their SRECs.


Massachusetts DOER Raises Solar Requirement for 2011

Posted June 17th, 2010 by SRECTrade.

The Massachusetts DOER made its final changes pertaining to the implementation of the solar carve-out program in the state’s RPS class I revised regulation. Most noteworthy of the changes, the DOER increased the solar requirement for the 2011 energy year to 69MW, or a total of 78,577 MWh. The increase in the solar requirement is a welcome development for SREC markets in Massachusetts, coming on the heels of the TransCanada legislation, which reduced the solar requirement for Massachusetts (more information on the TransCanada legislation here). This is a good indication that the state has levers it can pull to ensure the state supports a thriving SREC market, providing the market with some stability.

This should serve to counterbalance the change prompted by the TransCanada settlement that exempts certain buyers from the solar carve-out.

To see the all the changes made to the legislation see the RPS Class I Revised Regulation with Tracked Changes.


Solar Bill Could Create New York SREC Market

Posted June 16th, 2010 by SRECTrade.

A strong solar bill currently moving through the state senate has the potential to make New York a national solar leader. The New York Solar Jobs Act of 2010 establishes aggressive annual solar capacity targets, reaching 2.5% of the state’s total energy–an estimated 5GW–by 2025.

The legislation would also provide a strong economic opportunity in the state. According to NREL’s Job and Economic Development model, the program will support about 22,000 jobs. On top of this, New York is expected receive a $20 billion boost to its economy. Independent energy consultants from Crossborder Energy estimated the cost of the program to be a 39 cent increase in each NY resident’s energy bill.

If this bill is passed into law, New York will be in position for a robust SREC market. SRECTrade already has a presence with many New York solar companies, and as soon as this bill is passed we will be working toward establishing a market for SRECs in the state.

For more information on the bill, find the complete article here.


DE SRECs trading at prices above ACP

Posted June 11th, 2010 by SRECTrade.

SREC auctions in Delaware have been closing at a price of $300. This is higher than Delaware’s solar ACP, which begins at $250 per MWh. This discrepancy is caused by increases in the penalty for electricity suppliers after the first time they fall short of their solar requirement. The solar ACP increases to $300 after the first time an electricity supplier falls short, and then increases to $350 for any subsequent penalties.

So in summary, the reason you might see prices higher than $250 is because buyers are forced to pay a higher fine if they have previously fallen short on their requirement.


Impact of TransCanada Settlement on Mass SREC Market

Posted June 9th, 2010 by SRECTrade.

Statement from the Massachusetts DOER

While DOER realizes as a practical matter that providing a reduced ACP Rate for pre-existing contracts will result in a reduction in the demand for SRECs in the early years of the program, that exact percentage is unknown at this time.  The demand will be a direct reflection on that percentage of load that was contracted for prior to January 1, 2010 which is data that DOER does not generally collect.  DOER did discuss this issue with a handful of competitive retail suppliers, and under a confidentiality agreement, obtained contract information from 8 suppliers serving about 1500 GWh in 2009.  DOER provides the following information with no warranty of its accuracy beyond the above stated parameters.

Approximately 50% of the retail load in Massachusetts is served by competitive suppliers, and of that portion, DOER estimates that about 70-90% of that load will be served in 2010 under a pre-2010 contract.  This percentage decreases dramatically in the following years as contracts expire or are renewed, such that in 2011 only 40% of the competitive supply load will be served by pre-2010 contracts.  This trend continues with 20% in 2012, 10% in 2013, and under 5% in 2014.

It is important to remember that combined with the growth in the Minimum Standard each year, the overall percent of applicable load relative to the Standard diminishes even more substantially.

While DOER hopes this very limited analysis provides some information to the solar development community but will not assure its accuracy beyond the given parameters or be responsible for any further conclusions drawn by any market participant.  DOER will receive additional information on load under contracts by retail suppliers as part of the 2009 Annual Compliance Filing and will report that information, in the aggregate, as soon as it is available.

SRECTrade Comment

Essentially what this is saying is that the settlement exempts suppliers under previous supply contracts from the SREC requirement.  This will impact 35-45% of the demand in the Massachusetts SREC market.  This means that if the requirement in 2010 was 30 MW of solar to meet the RPS, with these exemptions, the actual requirement will be 17-20 MW of solar.  In the following 3 years the impact is reduced to 20% of the total demand, 10% and 5%, respectively.  Fortunately, DOER has several levers it can pull to ensure that pricing of SRECs stays within the $300-$600 range. For example, if there is a surplus in 2010, the requirement for 2011 will likely be increased to adjust for the surplus. This should mitigate the impact of this settlement. Finally, even with the reduced demand, the state needs to get to an average solar capacity of 17-20MW in 2010.  This is no small task.


Massachusetts SRECs 101

Posted June 8th, 2010 by SRECTrade.

What is an SREC? Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (SRECs) are created for every megawatt hour of electricity produced by solar generators. A 10 kW system produces about 12 SRECs a year. SRECS are sold separately from electricity, and the solar power generated does not need to be used for the SREC to be created.

Who buys SRECs? Electricity suppliers must buy SRECs to meet the Massachusetts RPS requirement. Threatened by a Solar Alternative Compliance Payment (SACP) of $600 per megawatt hour if they do not comply, these companies will pay up to this price for SRECs.

How do I sell SRECs? Since individual solar owners do not produce enough SRECs to sell direct to buyers, an intermediary mechanism must exist. SRECTrade created the SREC auctions to connect sellers directly to the buyers in the market in a simple, efficient and effective way. The closing price of each auction represents the fair market price based on supply and demand.

Massachusetts SREC Pricing: State has set up a controlled market for SRECs that creates a price range of $300-$600 per SREC. There are several levers available to the state to ensure that pricing stays within this range.  First, the electricity suppliers who fall short of their SREC requirements must pay a fine of $600 per SREC. This sets a ceiling price of $600. In years where there is an SREC shortage, pricing will be close to $600. If there is an oversupply of SRECs, then market prices will be at or near $300. The state ensures this floor price by having a last chance fixed-price auction at the end of the year. Buyers can bid to purchase the SRECs that are available at $300 per SREC. If there are still unsold SRECs remaining after this auction, the state will adjust the capacity requirements for the following year to compensate for this surplus and allow increase the life of the unsold SRECs from 2-years to 3-years. This will ensure a stable SREC price and give solar owners an assurance that prices will be above $300.

Massachusetts Solar Requirement: The state has set the requirement for the SREC program at 30 megawatts of solar in 2010. That is the equivalent of approximately 36,000 SRECs that need to be produced and purchased by suppliers in 2010.

Massachusetts SREC Program Logistics

  1. SRECTrade will submit PV project application to the DOER. Once this application is approved, their solar facility will be added to the NEPOOL GIS tracking platform, where SRECs will be created and transacted.
  2. Solar electricity generation is reported to the Production Tracking System (PTS).
  3. SRECs are generated quarterly in NE-GIS and are then posted in the SREC auctions.
  4. The state has committed to the program for 10 years. Each SREC is valid for 2 years, so an SREC created in 2010 can also be sold in 2011.

SRECTrade Aggregation Logistics

  1. Fill out the forms to enroll in EasyREC
  2. SRECTrade will submit your application to the DOER for approval and set up your SREC account – this takes a few weeks
  3. Once set up, SRECTrade will collect your readings at the beginning of each month using an online form or internet-enabled inverter
  4. SRECs are generated quarterly by NE-GIS
  5. SRECTrade hosts monthly auctions on the first Friday of each month. You will be notified of the result after each auction. Possible results include:
    1. Successful: X SRECs sold at Y Price
    2. Unsuccessful: Y Price was below minimum, X SRECs not sold
    3. No SRECs: None were available in this auction
  6. If successful, payments will be delivered by the end of the month via direct deposit or mailed check. If unsuccessful SRECs are carried forward to next auction

EasyREC customers own their SRECs until sold in auction or contracted in the Forwards Exchange.

For More Information: http://www.srectrade.com/massachusetts_srec.php


Connecticut SREC Program On Hold After Governor Rell Veto

Posted June 7th, 2010 by SRECTrade.

Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell vetoed Senate Bill 493, which would pave the way for an SREC Program in the state.  Rell argued that the Bill, titled An Act Reducing Electricity Costs and Promoting Renewable Energy, will fail to accomplish both aspects of its stated intent. The Bill declared that “The Division of Research, Energy and Technology shall, in accordance with the comprehensive plan approved pursuant to section 16a-3a of the general statutes, as amended by this act, (1) increase the state’s energy independence and security by promoting conservation and efficiency and the use of diverse indigenous and regional electric resources; [and] (2) encourage the use of renewable energy resources and new electric technologies, particularly technologies that support economic development in the state and promote environmental sustainability.” While the Bill never directly mentioned SRECs among a wide variety of energy related topics, Rell’s veto will slow the process of the creation of an SREC market in Connecticut.

The Bill’s proponents claim that the legislation would reduce energy costs, spark growth in the state’s renewable energy industry, create jobs, and stabilize the state’s electricity market. Senator Rell argues that these claims are “eerily reminiscent” to those made on a bill in Connecticut a decade ago, which has since failed to reduce utility prices or help spawn renewable energy in the State. Rell claims that the bill “is not in the best interests of the ratepayers or taxpayers of our state.” Rell never directly mentioned any effect on an SREC market, instead attacking the fiscal irresponsibility of the Bill.

The effect of the veto is being felt heavily in the state’s solar power industry. When asked about the prospects of solar power in the state, Mike Silvestrini, president of Middletown-based Green Skies Renewable Energy replied, “There is absolutely zero opportunity in Connecticut without the energy bill. Eventually we will have to make a decision on whether we can remain in this state.” The legislation would have provided the solar industry with incentives to build large projects on commercial facilities, much bigger business than small residential jobs. The idea was to bring in enough business that Economies of scale could kick in and the business could become self-sustaining.

Although Rell has vetoed the Bill, it could still pass if Democrats are able to drum up enough of a majority to override the veto. If they are unsuccessful, any hopes for an SREC market in Connecticut will have to be put on hold until the next round of legislative sessions.

Meanwhile, SRECTrade is exploring ways to help solar owners in Connecticut generate and sell SRECs outside of the state until the government puts a local market together.